(CLICK ON CAPTION/LINK/POSTING BELOW TO ENLARGE & READ)

Sunday, October 30, 2011

NILRATAN ADHYA, BAHARAMPORE MUNICIPALITY


BIJONBARI MOURNS DEATH OF ITS NEAR ONES


PENSIONEERS OF KOLKATA STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION DONOT GET PENSION




UMLESH YADAV-PAID NEWS

EDITORIAL OF GANASHAKTI DATED 25-10-2011

CLICK TO ENLARGE


CHARGE SHEET IN 2G SPECTRUM SCAM

EDITORIAL OF GANASHAKTI DATED 25-10-2011

CLICK TO ENLARGE


ROXY CINEMA HALL, KOLKATA


KOLKATA-DIGHA ROAD


ROADS IN MIDNAPORE UNDER MAMATA RULE


BIG WIN FOR THE CENTER-LEFT FORCES IN ARGENTINE ELECTIONS


Argentine voters rewarded President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner for a booming economy with a big reelection victory on Oct. 23. The victory will strengthen the trend of left of center governments working toward the economic and political integration of Latin America, which has challenged the long history of US domination of the region.

Kirchner's victory came almost on the first anniversary of the death of her husband, Nestor Kirchner, who had preceded her in the presidency.

Nestor Kirchner's place in Argentina's history books is assured because when he was elected in 2003, Argentina was in terrible economic shape and over its head in debt to international lenders. Rather than impose austerity measures on the Argentine people, thereby lowering even more living standards that had been dropping steadily under a series of corrupt military and civilian governments, Kirchner chose to default on a large portion of the country's international debt, striving instead to build up the country's internal markets.

A devaluation of the currency followed, making Argentina's exports more attractive in other countries. Although Argentina had a rough time at first, the Kirchner policy was eventually so successful that Argentina was able to renegotiate its relationships with international lenders, including the International Monetary Fund. In international affairs, Kirchner's government played a major role in scuttling the U.S.-sponsored "Free Trade Area of the Americas" (FTAA), and in building up first MERCOSUR and then UNASUR as mechanisms of "horizontal" economic and political integration of the nations of South America, through enhanced regional trade and development aid.

Kirchner also faced down ultra-rightist tendencies in the military, and began the process of calling to account the military officers who had committed atrocities during the dictatorship of 1976 to 1983.

Kirchner's wife, Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, was the candidate of the left wing of the Justicialist Party in the 2007 elections, and won with 45 percent of the vote. The Justicialist Party was founded by former Argentine President Juan Domingo Peron, who initially governed from 1946 to 1955.

Peron was overthrown by a military coup but came back as president again from 1973 to 1974. During Peron's second presidency and that of his second wife Isabel (1974 to 1976), splits in the Justicialist Party led to a situation of very violent repression by the Justicialist right and the military against the left. A military dictatorship ousted Isabel Peron and continued the "dirty war" in which at least 30,000 suspected leftists were murdered. Civilian rule was restored in 1983.

On October 23, Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, candidate of the Front for Victory in which the Judicialist left is the major component, won with 54 percent of the popular vote, eliminating the need for a runoff.

The rest of the field was far behind. Socialist Party candidate Hermes Binner got about 17 percent, while the Radical Party's Ricardo Alfonsin (son of former President Raul Alfonsin) got only 11 percent. Former President Eduardo Duhalde, running for the Popular Front-PJ representing right-wing Peronism, was far behind, with under 6 percent of the vote.

Cristinia Fernandez de Kirchner's victory margin of 36 percentage points over her closest rival, Binner, establishes a historic record. Moreover, she won all but one of Argentina's provinces.

In legislative elections, Kirchner and her allies have every reason to be pleased also. In legislative elections in 2009, Cristina Kirchner had lost her majorities in both houses of the Argentine Congress. However, this time around, it appears that much of the loss has been made up, and that in fact the government, with allies, will have an effective majority in both houses.

Some in the corporate media attributed the landslide vote for Cristina Kirchner to sympathy over the death of her husband. However, it is also true that like other countries in the region which have abandoned the "Washington Consensus" of neo-liberal policies such as "free" trade, austerity and privatization, Argentina, under her leadership, has managed to steer clear of the economic troubles which have caused suffering and uproar in much wealthier countries such as those of Western Europe, not to mention the United States.

Last year Argentina registered 8 percent in growth of its Gross Domestic Product, and unemployment is relatively low and consumer spending high. Agricultural exports are booming, and indebtedness is low. The opposition complained that the government was concealing a growing inflation problem, but evidently the voters perceived their living standards as growing, and gave the government its solid victory as a result.

The Communist Party of Argentina, which had supported Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner in the elections, hailed the victory and the accomplishments of her government. It called for bold new initiatives in tax and financial reform, and in dealing with extractive industries such as mining. The Party called for "a new law on mining which will impede this looting [of Argentina's resources] by the great transnational monopolies."

MAMATA BRINGS BACK LOADSHEDDING AFTER 34 YEARS OF LEFT RULE



BHAIRAB BAHIN USES RABINDRA SANGEET TO EXTORT MONEY


POET NAZRUL ISLAM AND INTERNATIONAL SONG


OCCUPATION OF LIBYA BY CIA-NATO FORCES


RAILWAY OFFICE, MUKHRAM KANORIA ROAD, HOWRAH


AMTA-BAGNAN


PRANAB KUMAR MUKHERJEE-CHIDAMBRAM


BIG WIN FOR THE CENTER-LEFT FORCES IN ARGENTINE ELECTIONS


SAFARUDDIN MIA


DHULIAN MUNICIPALITY


JUTE CULTIVATORS IN TROUBLE


HORRIBLE EARTHQUAKE IN TURKEY


BHAIRAB BAHINI AND ANANDA BAZAR PATRIKA


MUAMMAR GADDAFI MURDERED


PANCHANAN KARMAKAR


CPI (M) BURDWAN DISTRICT COMMITTEE CONFERENCE AT DURGAPUR


10TH FINANCE COMMISSION AND TRIPURA


T.GOVINDAN


AJIT KUMAR KAYAL


DOES MAMATA REALLY WANT TO TACKLE MAOIST PROBLEM?


SIVAGANGAI MUNICIPALITY


HAJ PILGRIMS OF WEST BENGAL


VACHATHI VERDICT: 269 CONVICTED, 17 FOR RAPE



CPI (M) OFFICE IN BELIAGHATA



RIKSHAW PULLERS TORTURED BY POLICE OF MAMATA BANERJEE




RS25 FOR COMMMON MAN, 1,366 TIMES THAT FOR MONTEK SINGH AHLUWALIA

The Planning Commission told the Supreme Court on Tuesday that Rs25 a day (Rs32 in urban areas) is “adequate” for Indians to get 1,200 calories of food, good health care and education and, therefore, Indians are not poor. Easy for a Commission to say such a thing because between the deputy chairperson and the members, they take home a neat sum of Rs10.25 lakh in salaries every month.

Add to that perks assured to them and the bill goes up by Rs5 lakh. This, because as deputy chairman of the Planning Commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia has the status of a full cabinet minister and gets a salary that hovers around Rs1.10 lakh every month, give or take a few thousand.

His colleagues, the eight members in the commission, hold the rank and pay of a minister of state and draw something in the region of Rs1lakh. Add to that the salary of the lone minister of state, Ashwini Kumar, and you get a bill that would ensure food, health and education for 1,366 people every month if they stuck to the Rs25 per day bounty!

As deputy chairman, Ahluwalia also gets other perks, including a fully furnished rent-free home in Lutyens’ Delhi.

He gets medical treatment free of charge in government-maintained hospitals. Similarly, the other members of the Commission also enjoy all the perks that a minister of state is entitled to, and these usually add another Rs50,000 to their pay packages in monetary terms.

During UPA-1, they would have a party at the residence of a member on a rotational basis every weekend, a source in the Commission told DNA. Which is why, said sources, the Commission saw pitched battles between the members and the deputy chairman before this affidavit was filed.

“We have no idea who was pushing this affidavit but we do know that the prime minister did see it before it was filed in the Supreme Court,” one of the members of the Commission told DNA. Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar report that formed the basis for the affidavit was only an exercise to ascertain a methodology to assess the number of below poverty line families in India.

Instead, the Commission used it as the final word on deciding that a family has to starve to be eligible for a welfare scheme. “The Tendulkar committee was meant to just provide a comparable estimate so that policymakers can get an assessment of how to find out how many BPL families exist. How it became the basis for deciding on assessing who are poor is beyond me,” Mihir Shah, one of the members of the Planning Commission told DNA.

According to Shah, the actual data on who is poor can only come after the socio-economic survey undertaken by the ministry of social justice and empowerment gets over.

“That data will give us a more nuanced idea of what is the actual scale of poverty in India. It will show us different segments of the marginalised and give us specific data. Only after we get that data can we formulate a policy,” he said.

Obviously, the Planning Commission and its privileged deputy chairman and his colleagues did not have the patience to wait for the real numbers. Too busy defending corporate India and its interests, they sold out the aam aadmi who had voted the UPA to power twic

RS25 FOR COMMMON MAN, 1,366 TIMES THAT FOR MONTEK SINGH AHLUWALIA


DEEPAWALI PREPARATIONS


BANKURA TMC INFIGHTING